Active defence

WHEN firms merge, their bosses gush Panglossian jargon. So it was with the tie-up announced this week of Henderson Global Investors, an Anglo-Australian asset manager, and Janus Capital, an American one. Janus Henderson, as the combined business will be known, will become a “truly global” asset manager that will deliver “compelling value creation”, boasted its American half. Yet behind the boosterism lie the real fears of active fund managers: of losing business to passive ones—ie, those offering funds that simply track a market index. It is hard not to see the merger as, more than anything, a defensive move.

To be fair, the companies do have a strong business case for merging. Janus is deeply established in America and Japan. It is famous for having in 2014 hired Bill Gross, the “bond king”, when he abruptly left Pacific Investment Management Co, PIMCO, the firm he co-founded and turned into a giant. Henderson’s sales network is centred on Europe. The firms stand to gain more from selling each other’s products in new markets than they will lose from stepping on each other’s toes.

Moreover, the combined…Continue reading

This post was originally published in the Economist.

Advertisements
Active defence

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s